Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 14:37:33
NYC Public Library Research Room NYC Public Library Research Room

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, Left[edit]

  •  Keep -- Claus 14:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment @Claus Obana and Diliff: I made the sections and moved your vote. If my decision is wrong, please move your vote or all revert what I did. --Laitche (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delist this one as well. There's a clear patch on the left wall column/ceiling from fixing of the stitching issue in the original (right) image. -- KTC (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Huh? But instead of just delisting, it could be fixed, either by myself or someone else... No need to delist an image over a very minor stitching issue. Diliff (talk) 17:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • Also, could you point out what exactly you mean? The left wall/column looks pretty clean IMO. I don't think even a pixel-peeper would notice any problems with the column unless directly comparing to the version with the stitching problem. Is that really how we should be judging images? Diliff (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • It's not a case of minor mis-alignment. There is that, but more importantly, the sharpness is completely different as if the patch was blurred before being applied. I will of course withdraw my vote if that was fixed. (I have added an image note to the iamge) -- KTC (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • I know what you mean but sorry, I think you may be too picky to delist :) --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • I agree with Laitche, I think you were being a bit picky, but I've uploaded a new version which I think is an improvement. I don't have the original files to re-stitch anymore, so I had to use the clone tool as best I could. It's up in the top corner, not many people would notice it unless they were really looking for faults. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • I accept that may well be the case, but since I did notice it, I couldn't ignore it. Either way, thanks, and I've struck my delist vote. -- KTC (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
              • I think we all notice minor faults or things that could have been done better but they don't all result in opposes or delist votes. ;-) Also, we don't usually delist an existing historic FP unless there's a really good reason (like a duplicate, or a serious fault that was missed at the time it became a FP). But anyway, thanks for striking it. Diliff (talk) 12:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep. — Julian H.✈ 20:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep. --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg, Right[edit]

Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted.
Delisted alternative is File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg --Laitche (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/removal/File:NYC_Public_Library_Research_Room_Jan_2006-1-_3.jpg&oldid=160904385"